Share 
Former NDP MP Brian Masse helped push legal single‑event sports betting through Parliament. He now says the way provinces have implemented the change is ‘deplorable’ and has increased player exposure to gambling advertising.
The criticism highlights growing concern about provincial regulatory choices—particularly Ontario’s open private market—and what that means for players across the Canadian iGaming market.
What does the data show?
Masse framed the legislation as a local jobs and public‑safety measure for Windsor, Ont., when he first introduced a private member’s bill in 2019. The prohibition on single‑event betting was removed federally in 2021 with broad parliamentary support. However, Masse and other critics say the federal change left too much discretion to provinces.
Key points and evidence
- Provincial implementation varies: Ontario opened a private, licensed iGaming market with 47 operators active since April 2022, while other provinces have kept Crown control. Masse says allowing many private operators has led to heavy commercialization.
- Advertising surge: A 2024 analysis by the University of Bristol and CBC’s Marketplace found that gambling messages occupied up to 21% of sports broadcast time in Ontario. Ontario Sen. Marty Deacon called the ad environment “bananas” because so many operators compete for attention.
- Health and harms data: A Canadian Medical Association Journal study found a more than 300% increase in young men contacting Ontario’s mental‑health helpline for gambling‑related problems.
Stakeholder positions
- Brian Masse: Says the rollout should have been slower and more centrally managed. He recommended handing single‑event betting to the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation. Masse also supports stricter ad rules.
- Renze Nauta (Cardus): Calls for banning or severely restricting sports‑betting advertising, citing harms.
- Paul Burns (Canadian Gaming Association): Argues the industry already operates in a tightly regulated space and that ad bans alone won’t solve problem gambling; provinces have jurisdiction and expertise.
- Legislative response: Senator Marty Deacon’s Bill S‑211 has passed the Senate. It is designed to create national standards to regulate sports‑betting advertising and prevention measures. Currently, it is at second reading in the House of Commons. This reflects federal interest in ad rules despite provincial control of gambling.
What does this mean for players?
Increased exposure to betting marketing can raise the risk of impulse play and harm, especially for younger men and those vulnerable to addiction. Players should be aware that the Canadian rollout produced a diverse market. In Ontario, that means many private brands are competing openly. This tends to drive heavier advertising and promotion.
Practical steps for concerned players:
- Set personal limits on time and spending, and use account limits where available.
- Reduce exposure by using ad‑blockers, skipping sponsored segments, or choosing ad‑free streaming where possible.
- Seek help early if gambling is causing stress. Contact provincial problem‑gambling services or mental‑health hotlines. Treatment and support resources are available confidentially.
This coverage is about policy and player protection, not promotion of any operator or offer.
What to watch next?
Monitor Bill S‑211’s progress through the House of Commons and any federal or provincial consultations on advertising standards. Provinces may also revise licensing rules or advertising restrictions; Ontario’s market rules and any OLG policy decisions are especially important. Keep an eye on new research and helpline trends if you’re concerned.
